Showing posts with label TS-2000. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TS-2000. Show all posts

11 December 2012

A proposed root cause for the "Withering Filters" phenomenon

Fig. 1 Photo by Jerzy,
SP6FPY. 
(Click to enlarge)
After having examined the failure mechanism of more than 100 ceramic filters that have succumbed to electromigration, I think I have collected enough data to propose a root cause for the phenomenon that has caused failure of a very large numbers of filters. I should gratefully thank the many fellow radio amateurs that have sent photos of their filters to me, adding to my database on the subject. Manufacturers might want to consider changing their production methods to avoid the chain of events that I propose that leads to this phenomenon.

So, let's look at the data I have collected and a proposed theory that explains the facts:

Fig. 2. Note the water droplets.
1) In all of the ceramic filters I have examined, there was a surprising quantity of water inside the plastic case (take a look at Figs 1, 2 and observe the signs of water presence on the elements and inside the black case, also the whitish flux residue on the case of the adjacent filter in Fig. 1, which shows that a quantity of water evaporated from that surface, leaving it behind). The water inside the case causes the filter to fail soon after the transceiver circuit applies DC voltage to the input, and mainly the output pins of the filter. The quantity of water is such, that can't be attributed to a filter manufacturing flaw: it's just too much. I can't imagine that the filter manufacturers would have ignored it. Also, I haven't found water inside some new filters I have "dissected". So, there must be another reason for this quantity of water inside the filter.

2) Where does the water come from, if not from a filter manufacturing flaw? I think the answer lies with the newer technologies and materials used for the fabrication of populated printed circuit boards (PCBs). Briefly, the new methods of wave soldering with non-Pb solders extensively use organic acid (OA) fluxes. Those fluxes are removed from the PCBs after wave soldering by pressure rinsing with hot water. The rinsing process takes some time to complete.

3) I think that the water ingress can be explained thus. The rinsing process uses hot water (about 70 degrees Celsius), sometimes with ionic additives. This (as well as the previous soldering process) causes the (so far dry) air inside the plastic filter case to expand, creating positive pressure inside the filter case. This results in air escaping from inside the filter case, as the temperature softens the plastic case and compromises the (not so great to begin with) sealing at the bottom of the filter case.
When the PCB exits the rinsing process, water is held by affinity under the filter case, between the filter and the PCB surface. The filter starts cooling down, and this causes the pressure inside the filter to drop under the atmospheric pressure. This negative relative pressure tends to draw a small quantity of the water under the filter inside the filter case, through the very fine cracks at the filter case seals that the positive air pressure (when the filter was hot) created. The quantity of the water is some micrograms, but it's more than enough to cause trouble. The board is then dried, but the accident has already happened. The water is already inside the filter.

4) Once inside the filter, the water can't escape and remains trapped inside the case. Some of it condenses or moves on the filter plates, starting the electromigration process where the electric field (due to the externally applied voltage) reaches sufficient value. This most often occurs at the corners of the thin output ceramic plate (element) at the output of the filter, which is only about 0.35 mm thick. This leads to the failure of the filter after some time.

5) What might be a solution? A slight modification of the rinsing - drying process might help in avoiding this phenomenon.
If the PCB is dried IMMEDIATELY after exiting the rinsing chamber with pressurised HOT air, then the water might not get inside the filter case, as the pressure difference doesn't occur this way before the water has been removed from under the filter.
I have no further knowledge of the exact conditions used in any particular case, so the above proposal may not always apply. But each manufacturer could certainly review the method used and modify it accordingly, so as to avoid the conditions that drive water inside the filter case (and possibly inside other "sealed" components, such as miniature relays).

If someone with more knowledge of the PCB processing methods wishes to add (or correct!) something in the above, please send an e-mail to sv8ym@raag.org.

73 DE SV8YM

Addendum: The above suggest that if you repair (clean and dry thoroughly with hot air) or replace a filter that has gone bad through water ingress during the rinsing procedure with a brand new one that hasn't come in contact with water, you may not have problems in the long run, even if you don't also install DC-blocking capacitors. That is so because you need BOTH water AND a voltage gradient to start electromigration. A completely dry filter probably can withstand 7-8 V indefinitely (as experience with older rigs shows - the PCBs were washed with organic solvents a long time ago, in the paleolithic Pb era!).
 

18 October 2010

More on the withering filters case: The TS-2000 disappearing noise conundrum

A few months ago, a friend gave me his TS-2000 to check, because occasionally there was a crackling noise coming out of the speaker (and showing on the S-meter) during SSB weak signal reception (SW8KOU operates EME on 2m).
However, when I checked the rig, the noise just wasn't there. I checked for bad SMD components or soldering, but found nothing. I returned it, the noise eventually came back even louder after a few days, he gave it back to me to check it again, and guess what - the noise was absent again. I gave it back to him again, and he reported there were sporadic outbursts of noise now and then.
Eventually, the noise came back to stay, and loud it was!! It resembled lightning noise, heard during a storm on a low HF band and registered S2 ~ S5 on the S-meter. This time the noise was kind enough to be there when I powered the rig up on the test bench. It could be heard on SSB only, not on FM (with the proper test setup). I had already previously checked the rig thoroughly for bad SMD components or bad solder connections, and, having seen many "withered" ceramic filters in the meantime (in other rigs), it suddenly dawned on me that the noise could very well be emanating from a faulty ceramic filter! The schematic diagrams showed two such filters in the SSB signal's path, CF3 and CF4 in the TX-RX unit.
To make a long story short, the culprit was CF4. The filter had suffered the same degradation I describe in another post, but in a more gradual way, due to different conditions. The other cases I have examined had about 7V applied to the filter's pins, but the circuit around CF4 applied about only 1.5V to it. The degradation was there, but the symptoms and time scales were different. I measured about 1MΩ from the output pin to the nearest ground pin, which was far more resistance than the usual 20 ~ 100 Ω I had previously measured in other malfunctioning filters. That explained the crackling noise and the fact that the receiver didn't go totally deaf, like in the other cases. The lower voltage was slower to act on the filter, and the degradation was milder. I opened up the filter, and, there you are, I could immediately see the effects of oxidation on the phosphor bronze spring plate. I removed the thin element at the output side, and sure enough, it showed the telltale signs clearly (see the photo, click on it to enlarge). After carefully cleaning the edges in the way I have described, the resistance reading was more than 40ΜΩ. I soldered the filter back in place, and the noise was gone. My friend tells me that the receiver is very quiet now (but let's see what happens when eventually CF3 (with 7V applied to it) breaks down, too!).
 I will shortly publish the solution to this vexing problem, consisting of just adding two DC-blocking capacitors at each filter (the example mod will be performed in an ailing TM-D710). The same simple concept, however, holds for the modification of all similarly affected rigs.